|
PROPHECIES FOR 10,000 SAINTS
&
THEIR LEADER
THE ORACLE WHICH HABAKKUK SAW..
The above is an opening line from 'The Book
of Habakkuk'. A partial manuscript of this book from the Old Testament,
written in a pre Masoretic Hebrew text with its commentary, was recently
found among the Scrolls discovered from the Dead Sea. The Book's name is
also included in the ancient catalogues of the Hebrew Scriptures. These
prove the canonicity and authenticity of the document. Majority of the
bible scholars are of the opinion that the Book was written between 612
and 589 B.C., by prophet Habakkuk. Author's identity appears in the text.
Prophet Habakkuk was a royal scribe and a Levitical
temple musician in Judah (the southern kingdom). He was deeply disturbed
to see the law being ignored, perverted justice being delivered and the
righteous being surrounded by the wicked. (Habakkuk 1:4). The prophet could
not understand why the JUST GOD was not punishing the wicked, so he desperately
cried out:
How long, O Lord, shall I cry,
And Thou wilt not hear?
I cry out unto Thee of violence,
And Thou wilt not save.
Why dost Thou show me iniquity,
And beholdest mischief?... (Habakkuk
1:2-3).
The translations are according to the Masoretic
Text. The opening chapter of the book deals with the prophet's complains
about the diabolic injustice. The almighty God finally answered and said
to Habakkuk:
Write the Vision;
And make it plain upon tables,
That a man may read it swiftly. (Habakkuk
2:2).
The God did not dictate the text of the Vision.
Habakkuk saw the Vision and wrote it in a very flowery, poetic language.
God said; the Vision he saw was not to be fulfilled within a short span
of time.
It was for an appointed time, at the end:
"And it declareth of the end,
and doth not lie;
Though it tarry, wait for it;
Because it will surely come,
it will not delay." (Habakkuk 2:3).
There is a vast difference between God's concept
and man's concept for the tarry (delay) "waiting period". We relate it
with our life span, God with the span of His Creation. The Vision which
Habakkuk saw was fulfilled some twelve and half centuries later. The prophet's
prayers and the text of the Oracle (Vision), which appear in the third
chapter, are according to a Shigionoth; meaning, a poem that can be recited
accompanied by the Stringed Instruments.
God cometh from Teman,
And the Holy
One from mount Paran.
~Selah~
His glory covereth the heavens,
And earth is full of His praise. Habakkuk
3:3
Notes:
1. "God"
in a poetical language could mean; "God's Word",
(The Revelation).
2. "Teman"
means South, i.e. area which is South of the
Land of Judah
or South of Jerusalem.
3. "Holy One from
mount Paran" is a reference to prophet
Muhammad
(s.a.s.), as we shall soon discover from the
related
texts from the other Books of the Bible.
"Paran"
is a biblical name for the part of Arabia where prophet
Muhammad was born.
When prophet Ishmael and his mother
were driven out by
Sarah; they settled in the "Wilderness
of Paran" (Genesis
21:21). Prophet Ishmael happens to be
the progenitor of
prophet Muhammad.
"mount
Paran" is a reference to the
mountain near Mekkah,
where theprophet
received his first Revelation.
4. "Selah"
is musical note for an interlude
to recite His Praise.
5. The prophetic "past tense"
of the Vision refers to the
events that are to happen in the "future".
The sun and moon stand still in their habitation;
At the light of Thine arrows as they go,
At the shining of Thy glittering spear.
Thou marchest through the earth in indignation,
Thou threshest the nations in anger.
Thou are come forth for the deliverance of Thine anointed;
Thou woundest the head out of the house of the wicked,
Uncovering the foundation even unto the neck.
~Selah~ (Habakkuk 3:11-13)
In the 'New Revised Standard Bible' the last two lines of the above
text are translated in a language that is easier to understand, which reads;
You crushed the head of the wicked house,
laying it bare from foundation to roof.
Criticism: One
well known Christian critic, Jochen Katz, writes on his web page
'Answering Islam':
"In Habakkuk 3:3, Deuteronomy 33:2, and
Jude 14, it clearly is
said that the LORD came or will come with his ten thousands of holy
ones. It is plain idolatry to substitute the name of God with Muhammad.
It is amazing how easily Meherally commits what is according to his book
the worst of all sins. We call on him to repent of his idolatry in applying
statements about God to Muhammad."
Response: I reproduce
below what I have already mentioned in my earlier article Prophecy No.
1. The critic has simply overlooked it:
In the Old Testament, the God often speaks "I"
will do this, or "I" have done this; whereas,
He has chosen human beings to do these jobs on His behalf. (e.g. Deut.
32:39ff and 2 Samuel 12:12).
Criticism: The
critic Jochen Katz writes under the heading 'Ten Thousand Frauds';
"One of the strangest errors is that Mr. Meherally
correctly quotes Deuteronomy 33:2 and Jude 14, but fails to see that both
passages speak of "ten thousands" not "ten thousand". The words are in
the plural, both in Hebrew (Deuteronomy) and in Greek (Jude).
Response: The
Hebrew word used in Deut 33:2 "rbabah", pronounced: reb-aw-baw' is translated
under Strong's Number: 7233-HSN as a myriad (whether definite or indefinite):
KJV--many, million, X multiply, ten thousand. The Greek word used
in Jude 14 is Strong's Number: 3461-GSN Transliterated: "murias",
Pronounced: moo-ree'-; a ten-thousand; by extension, a "myriad" or indefinite
number: KJV—ten thousand.
Please notice: In both the instances "myriad"
means "ten thousand"
as per Strong's Concordance to the Bible.
One may also consult an English Dictionary
for further verification.
Besides, the correct plural term would be
"tens of thousands", which is not to be found in any of the quoted passages
of the Bible.
------------------------------
The links of the above prophecy for Paran regarding; crushing
the head of the wicked house, connects with the prophecies recorded
below and the one that has been mentioned in the earlier article. In case
you
have not read the article 'PROPHECY # 1', please click HERE
and read under the heading; 'A PROPHET IN THE LAND
OF KEDAR',
the details of a prophecy by
prophet Isaiah on the subject of;
"utterly putting to shame those who trust
in idols, who say to the
molten images, "You are our gods."
10,000 SAINTS WITH GOD'S LAW
Nearly twenty centuries before the birth of prophet Muhammad and
a short while before his own death, prophet Moses speaking on the subject
of the Holy One from mount Paran, said to
his people:
And he said, The Lord came from Sinai,
and rose up from Seir unto them;
he shined forth from mount Paran,
and he came with ten thousands of saints:
from his right hand {went} a fiery law for them.
Yea, he loved the people;
all his saints {are} in Thy hand:
and they sat down at Thy feet;
{every one} shall receive of Thy words.
(KJV) Deut 33:2
Notes:
1. "Sinai" The
holy mountain where upon Moses spoke with God.
2. "Seir" The
mountainous region between the Dead Sea and the Gulf
of Aqaba, where Moses spoke
with God. See Deut. 2:1.
3. "ten thousandsof
saints" Please read the next section.
4. "a fiery law"
The
only "Law" from the Almighty God that has come
to Paran (Arabia) in its history,
which judges between the wicked and
benevolent, the evil and good,
the immoral and moral,
the corrupt and virtuous,
is "the Criterion" (Ar. al-Furqan),
a synonym for the'Holy Qur'an'.
5. "Thy words"
The
Holy Qur'an is the collection of "God's Words"
revealed to the prophet.
6. "(KJV)" I
have reproduced the text from the King James Version
because it very precisely
speaks of the "ten thousands of saint".
'A BIOGRAPHY OF THE PROPHET'
Karen Armstrong was a Roman Catholic nun for
seven years. Since 1982 she has been a TV broadcaster and a writer. Her
prestigious work and the best seller, 'History of God' has earned her an
envious reputation. In her most recent publication, 'Muhammad,
A Biography Of The Prophet', she writes:
At the end of 628 A.D., the Meccans
broke the Treaty of Hudaybiyah....
On 10 Ramadan, January 630, Muhammad
set out at the head of the largest army every to leave Madina. Nearly all
the men in the umma
had volunteered and along the road their Bedouin allies joined the expedition
bringing the number up to 10,000 men.
(On Thursday, 20 Ramadan Hijri
8 (11 January 630) Muslim army entered the city of Mekkah. The army was
offered practically no resistance. Only a handful of Mekkan offered resistance.
The rest stayed indoor.)
Muhammad had come to Mekkah not to persecute the Quraysh
but to abolish the religion which had failed them. ...he rode
round the Ka'aba seven times, touching the black stone each time and crying
'al-Llahu
Akbar!' The shout was taken up
by his
10,000 soldiers
and soon the whole city resounded with words
that symbolished the final victory of Islam.
Next Muhammad turned his attention
to the 360 idols around the shrine; crowded on to their roofs and balconies,
the Quraysh watched him smash each idol while he recited the verse:
"the truth has come,
and falsehood has vanished away;
surely falsehood
is certain to vanish." (Sura 17:82)
This expedition of prophet Muhammad with 10,000 Holy Ones,
crushed the head of the wicked house, laying it bare from foundation to
roof. That was the end of the idol
worshipping, the termination of the age of ignorance and the cessation
of the wicked and immoral acts based upon superstitions, in Paran.
From a *historical* point of view, one can
say that upon the success or failure of this historical expedition depended
the future of prophet's mission and the establishment of Islam as a Nation.Almost
all the biographers of the prophet have recorded the
details of the above historical expedition. And, the figure of 10,000
dedicated followers
(the Holy Saints), who had joined the prophet
in this expedition, is mentioned by the majority of them. Listed below
are just a few biographers and their works:
1.
The eminent French Orientalist Maxime Rodinson, in his book
'Mohammed' writes on page 259:
At last he (Muhammad) set out with what was usual in Arabia
at that time, and immense army: ten thousand
men.
2. Biographer Martin Ling's
work, (life of) 'Muhammad' is based on Arabic
sources of the eighth and ninth centuries. Martin had a degree in Arabic
and was a keeper of Oriental Manuscripts at the British Museum. On page
293, he writes:
The Bedouin faithfully responded; and when the appointed day came
the army was the largest that had ever set out from Medina. No able-bodied
Muslim stayed behind. The Emigrants were seven hundred, with three hundred
horses; the Helpers were four thousand, with five hundred horses; and the
tribes, including those who joined them on the way, brought the total numbers
up to nearly ten thousand men.
3. Sir John Glubb had spent most
of his adult life in Arabia. He was fluent in Arabic. His work; 'The
Life and Times of Muhammad' is considered to be sound, comprehensive
and popular work in English on prophet's life and people of the Prophet.
He writes on page 305:
...no sooner had Abu Sofian left, than the Apostle gave orders for
all to prepare for the march on Mecca. Ten thousand
men are said to have answered his call. When we remember that, only
two years before, he had been followed to Hudaibiya by only one thousand
four hundred Muslims, the extent of the revolution in his favour in those
two years can be readily appreciated.
EPISTLE BY CHRIST'S HALF
BROTHER
Jude, the author of the second
last book of the New Testament called 'The
Epistle of Jude' was brother of James and
hence he was a half brother of Jesus Christ. Jude was not a prophet. He
is not the author of the prophecy which we are about to read. He reminds
his people of the prophecy made by Enoch, the seventh generation from Adam,
who in a figurative term "walked with God". (God took him up see Gen. 5:24).
In verses 14-15-16 of his Epistle, Jude reproduces
the words of the Enoch's Prophecy, which reads:
"See, the Lord is coming with
ten thousands of his holy ones,
to execute judgment upon all,
and to convict everyone of all the deeds of
ungodliness
that they have committed in such an ungodly
way,
and of all the harsh things that ungodly sinners
have spoken against him."
These are grumblers and malcontents;
they indulge their own lusts;
they are bombastic in speech,
flattering people to their own advantage.
(NRSV)
Anyone who has read the biography of prophet Muhammad
and the acts committed by the Pagan Arabs of Paran, prior to the advent
of Islam, would see the above prophecy being fulfilled with the 'Mekkan
Expedition' by the prophet, reviewed earlier.
"ALLEGORICAL PROPHECIES"
King Solomon, the author, was a believer of
"One God". At the temple inauguration, he stood on a bronze platform and;
knelt on his knees in the presence of all
the assembly of Israel and spread out his hands towards heaven, and said;
"O Lord, the God of Israel, there is no God
like Thee
in heaven or on earth, keeping covenant
and showing loving kindness to thy servants
who walk before Thee with all their heart....
"
2 Chronicles 6:13-14 and 1 Kings 8:22-23.
Note: The scene resembles more like the one from
an Islamic Mosque.
Beginning with the Songs of Moses, more than ten percent
of the contents of the Bible comprises of "Songs". Out of that many, 'The
Song of Solomon' is designated; "Song of Songs" meaning, it is above the
rest. This is one of the most misunderstood Book of the Bible.
At the outset it appears to be an erotic Song which has no spiritual
value at all. A Song of profane love in which the Divine name of
God is kept out. It is more of a lover's drama that one would see in the
movies. King Solomon, who had at that time 60 queens and 80 concubines
(the King finally ended with 700 wives and 300 concubines) falls in an
erotic love with a country girl of Shulammite. This young maiden was already
in an "unwavering love" of her own, with a shepherd boy from her birth
place. Solomon tries to lure her with his wealth, by his skillful speeches
and by showering erotic praises of her extraordinary beauty. Shulammite
turns down all such offers and returns to her beloved.
For the centuries, the Bible readers and scholars
have debated; what could be the reason for this erotic "human love" song
to be included in the Holy Scripture? Does it have a figurative, allegorical
or a deep prophetic value that is not so easy to understand?
Kamal Salibi, professor of history at the American
University of Beirut has done an in-depth study of the Hebrew Scripture.
In
his book, 'The Bible came from Arabia' he describes he different views
held by different groups for the 'Song of Songs'. He writes on page 180:
Jews have traditionally interpreted the boldly erotic material included
in the 'Song of Songs' as a series of allegories which demonstrate God's
love for Israel. Christians regard the same passages as
allegorical prophecies relating to Christ's
love for the Church. To the Arab ear, however, the lyrics included in the
'Song of Songs' have a far less ethereal ring: they mean exactly what they
say, being early examples of a genre of erotica still very much
alive today.
The most important among the allegorical
prophecies to be found in the 'Song of Songs'
is the one wherein, the Shulammite maiden vividly describes before the
"daughters of Jerusalem" (women of the court), her "beloved" shepherd boy.
The prophetic poetic text of that glowing description, according to the
Masoretic text, is as under:
My beloved {is} white and ruddy,
Pre-eminent above
ten thousand.
His head {is as} the most fine gold,
His locks {are} curled, {and} black as a raven.
His eyes {are} like doves
Besides the water-brooks;
Washed with milk; {and} fitly set.
His cheeks {are} as a bed of spices, {as} banks of sweet herbs;
His lips {are as} lilies,
Dropping {with} flowing myrrh.
His hands {are as} rods of gold set with the beryl;
His body {is as} polished ivory overlaid {with} sapphires.
His legs {are as} pillars of marble, set upon sockets of fine gold;
His aspect {is} like Lebanon, excellent as the cedars.
His mouth {is} most sweet;
Yea, he {is} altogether lovely.
This {is} my beloved, and this {is} my friend,
O daughters of Jerusalem.
The Song of Songs 5:10/16
Here is the important question. How do we know that the above allegorical
prophecy or the description of an individual, applies to prophet
Muhammad and no one else? To decipher that I have reproduced below the
literal translation of the last verse, along with Hebrew Strong's (Dictionary)
Number (HSN) for the
key words:
His mouth (6310 HSN) {is} most sweet,
(4477
HSN)
Yea, he is altogether (3617 HSN) lovely
(4261
HSN)
This {is} my beloved, (1730 HSN)
and this my friend, (7453 HSN)
O daughters of (1323-HSN) Jerusalem.
(3389
HSN)
(LIT) SS 5:16
In a language belonging to the Semitic families,
biblical Hebrew being one of it, to understand the meaning of a particular
word or its correct Phonetic Sound, one goes to its "root" word. Those
who are familiar with the language of the Qur'an - the Arabic, which
is also a member of the western branch of the Semitic languages, could
easily understand and appreciate that to comprehend the correct meaning
Tawil of a particular word of the Qur'an or for its
proper Recitation the Tajweed, the reciter goes to its "root" word.
This Primitive root word is usually made-up of three letters from the Arabic
alphabet.
The Primitive root word of the Hebrew word for "lovely" HSN-4261,
used in the verse under study, as well as
for HSN-4262, meaning
"desired" is HSN 2530.
This
Primitive root word is also made-up of three letters from the Hebrew language.
Below is the Strong's Dictionary meaning of HSN
2530.
Strong's Number: 2530-HSN
Transliterated: chamad
Pronounced: khaw-mad'
Note: The
Phonetic Sound of the Transliteration "ch" ("kh") is
similar to "ch" in German "ach".
2530-HSN is a primitive root; to delight in: KJV--beauty,
greatly beloved,
covet, delectable thing, (X great) delight,
desire, goodly, lust,
(be) pleasant (thing), precious (thing).
Strong's Number: 4261-HSN
Transliterated: machmad
Pronounced: makh-mawd;
from 2530 HSN;
delightful; hence a delight. i.e object of affection or desire:-
beloved, desire, goodly, lovely, pleasnat (thing).
Strong's Number: 4262-HSN
Transliterated: machmud
Pronounced: makh-mood';
from 2530 HSN;
desired; hence, a valuable: KJV--pleasant thing.
These are not the literal prophecies. As seen earlier,
they are metaphorical, symbolic allegorical prophecies.
Jews
claim the allegories demonstrate God's love for Israel. Christians regard
the same passages asrelating to Christ's love for
his Bride, the Church. A Muslim's claim that the prophecies speak of prophet
Muhammad (the root word of which is "Ahmad") is on much more solid ground
than the other two, for the understated significant reasons:
1. The phrase; "Pre-eminent
above ten thousand" has ample support for "prophet Muhammad
of Arabia" in the several other Books of the Old Testament, as seen earlier.
The terms "Israel" and "Church" lack that kind of support.
2. The Phonetic Sound of the critical response giving away the identity
of the Beloved, starting with the words; "Yea, he is..." discloses the
proper name of the prophet -HSN-4261. Israel or Church's identity
does not come close.
3. The substitution of the prophet's proper name "Muhammad" with
its literal meanings, viz.; "the praised one" or "the glorified" remain
in complete harmony with the text of the above prophecy. The texts would
read ; "Yea, he is altogether praised" or "Yea, he is altogether glorified".
The Biography of prophet Muhammad could easily endorse
that the prophet was indeed; "altogether praised" and "altogether
glorified", in and around his mother land, before he departed from the
world. Today, 1.3 billion Muslims, living all over the world, Praise and
Glorify their prophet and pray before Allah to send His Peace upon their
Beloved prophet.
Important Note:A
question is sometimes asked; The Qur'an speaks of Jesus having said
to Jews about the coming of a messenger of God, after him, whose name shall
be Ahmad (Q. 61:6), why is that speech not recorded in the New Testament?
The answer to this is; It is an undisputed fact that the texts of the four
available Gospels have been revised and re-revised several times, in the
past and the present. Several texts have been injected and expunged. The
Gospel of Mark was the first to have been written. About 93% of its
material is repeated in Matthew and Luke, often using the same words. Mark
was not one of the 12 disciples of Jesus nor a witness to everything. It
is generally accepted by the church historians that Mark derived the accounts
of the sayings and acts of Jesus from Peter. And, the Gospel of Peter -
the original source document, which was in use until the second century
has been expunged. Under these circumstances to claim that all that Jesus
spoke has been preserved till this day, could not qualify as a true statement
of facts.
Al-Hamdulillah (All Praises Belong to Allah).
To visit the Home Page or to read other articles by the author, click:
INDEX
Please send your comments to author
Akbarally Meherally at webmaster9@mostmerciful.com
|